Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
...and check out the Hobie 33, with <b>3800 lbs</b> displacement. Those photos aren't taken with a camera lens that makes the boat look longer and sleeker. That's how they really look, with their 8' beam and 33' LOA. It's phrf rating is 96, and the asking price for this one is or was $9999., including trailer.
Hobbie 33 seems like an impressive boat (I've considered it before)... but that masthead rig and a large genoa I bet is a chore to tack! 5 crew indeed.
I race against one on the Patapsco River, and it's very fast, but my concern is whether it can handle the chop going to windward in the main body of the Bay, with it's light displacement. I think I'll ask the owner after the race next Wednesday.
What strikes me with the Hobie 33... is the relative low height mast (34') versus the length... The lifting keel is a huge bonus though. Because of the height though, the mast is farther back and the genoa is LONG... That with a symmetrical spin (which is faster of course DW for W/L courses) would make for a very BUSY crew. My goal is a light duty crew load (or nothing for them to do would be ideal)... which is why I steer myself towards furlers and asyms.
I would like a super go-fast boat that's fun around the cans, but is easily manageable to single hand. Ideally it'd be bigger than 25 feet, and trailerable, as well as simple to raise the mast... that leaves for a very SHORT list of boats!
The Capri 25 with a deck stepped mast, fixed 4'2" keel, and masthead rig are easy for me to sail myself (and launch and raise the mast)... retrieve is spotty, and the symmetrical kite is almost TOO big to handle for me alone.
I can't say I dislike either boat mentioned though, that Carrera 290 and the Hobie 33 are "interesting" to say the least.
Sorry my focus is generally on the smaller sport boats. So up the ladder into the FARRs and stuff aren't even on my radar (price or trailerability wise)....
Wow--that C-25 is massively class-illegal--do you suppose they're getting the standard TR PHRF rating in their races? If so,......... (Chuck Shaw could probably beat him anyway. )
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stinkpotter</i> <br />Wow--that C-25 is massively class-illegal--do you suppose they're getting the standard TR PHRF rating in their races? If so,......... (Chuck Shaw could probably beat him anyway. ) <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
If that C25 was rated on Canyon Lake it would be around 175-180! (We used to have a Carrera 290 racing - when you popped the shute the crew got whiplash!)
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Derek Crawford</i> <br />If that C25 was rated on Canyon Lake it would be around 175-180!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">Why would someone put that effort and expense into a C-25 hull instead of a boat designed to go fast? If it's clean up on the rating, well the C-25 rating no longer applies... I really don't get it.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Stinkpotter</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Derek Crawford</i> <br />If that C25 was rated on Canyon Lake it would be around 175-180!<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">Why would someone put that effort and expense into a C-25 hull instead of a boat designed to go fast? If it's clean up on the rating, well the C-25 rating no longer applies... I really don't get it. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">I don't get it either. The guy claimed to have invested $35,000 into the C25. A new 32' FT 10, with a phrf rating in the 40's, sold for $39,000. about 5-6 years ago.
Who said anything about boats being pratical?? I could easily spend 35,000 on my C25 over the years (if I had that many boating-bucks), even though it would probably make more sense to sell it and buy a different boat.... here's one, for example that has had a buncha money spent 'upgrading' it.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by britinusa</i> <br />'Keel Stepped Mast' Huh! No mast in the cabin as far as I can see from the pics.
Paul <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
If you look at the pic of the cabin looking forward, you can see the area where the mast support should be. Apparently the mast is not stepped in the interior photo.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by iwillnotsubmit</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by britinusa</i> <br />'Keel Stepped Mast' Huh! No mast in the cabin as far as I can see from the pics.
Paul <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
If you look at the pic of the cabin looking forward, you can see the area where the mast support should be. Apparently the mast is not stepped in the interior photo. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I was being sarcastic when I said that since that's they way it's listed in the ad and is obviously not a keel stepped mast.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by GaryB</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by iwillnotsubmit</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by britinusa</i> <br />'Keel Stepped Mast' Huh! No mast in the cabin as far as I can see from the pics.
Paul <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
If you look at the pic of the cabin looking forward, you can see the area where the mast support should be. Apparently the mast is not stepped in the interior photo. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I was being sarcastic when I said that since that's they way it's listed in the ad and is obviously not a keel stepped mast. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">I'm not sure how obvious it is... The interior photo makes it look like the forward bulkhead has been cut away toward the overhead, and the compression post may be gone. It could have been shot at the same time as the exterior photo with the mast down. It might be a different mast, sized to go through the cabintop to a keel step--possibly to help in changing the standing rigging for tighter sheeting or whatever. Given what else he did, I wouldn't put it past him to buy a carbon fiber, free-standing mast, although that isn't what's in the sailing shots. In any case, I'm not sure why that's a headline feature...
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.