Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
I posted this question generically to ADMIN earlier this week but did not get a reply so I'm posting it again here.
Not often, but on occasion a spreadsheet tool comes to light that is of interest. One I have been exploring of late is a tool to help examine differing anchoring approaches -- very good. Two questions: Is there a mechanism on this forum to share such tools safely (fear of infected macros is the issue). Is there interest in archiving and distributing such tools on this forum -- perhaps as an extension to the technical tips section? I do not suspect there would be many contributions, but particularly with all the talent on this forum this could prove quite interesting. What do you think?
you can post it on Google docs, then people can open it as HTML or Google-doc o see it before downloading it. OR just point to a download site that does its own precautions.
(I've been thinking about this trying to post some electrical spreadsheets)
Electrical (simple) boat spreadsheet drawings sounds electrifying to me... Would love to be able to install shore power, inverter etc. but am at a total loss where to begin. Can anyone help...
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">I am not the least bit ashamed to admit that I did not understand a word of that.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Basically talking about Instructional information done by way of computer program and how/if it can be incorporated into the tech-tips section.
Henk -- What would you like to do on your boat? Most of us have a battery, an engine with an alternator, running lights, mast light, steaming light, cabin lights, a VHF and a few accessories like a knot meter, depth gauge and GPS.
Some have radar, audio systems and an electric bilge pump.
Some have an inverter to produce 120VAC for TV sets, DVD players, computers, electric coolers. Some have shore power with a battery charger.
Given that you probably already have some of the above equipment, what are in your plans? There are some excellent reference books out there, and of course, this forum.
Voyager, I am truly impressed by the people who have all that stuff on their boats and don't have to worry about batteries.
I am always worried that: a) my batteries will run out and b) I won't be able to get into the marina, and end up spending th enight on th ehook out in the open without a light on.
Motivated me to buy a pile of butane and a lantern that can be hung in the rigging, but still, I am awestruck by th eboats who don't suffer battery stress.
Bruce: Thanks for asking... I'll work out a wish list to come up with an outline and will post it as new subject in the 250 specific forum... we do as well seem to have a lot of "electrical stuff", on board... perhaps butane & lanterns, as per Chris Prospector's suggestion, after all is the answer
Henk - For my purposes, I have my required nav lights, rechargeable fluorescent cabin lights (2 GE steel beam lights from Costco), a VHF and and a 10W FM & CD audio unit.
I use an inverter for my laptop and cell phone charger. The engine has both a pull start and an electric start, so I never have to worry about being "dead in the water" unless I run out of gas.
The battery provides about 80 AH. I use two 18W solar panels to keep the battery topped off most of the time, but sometimes I have to run the engine's alternator if I heavily discharge the battery.
I use ice in my 5 day Igloo cooler and a Coleman 'white gas' stove for coffee and cooking on overnight trips.
When I did my power spreadsheet, I found that I could manage an entire season using this approach.
I don't plan to get a TV set, a microwave or electric bilge pump for Passage.
Next season, I will look for a larger or an additional battery to provide a greater reserve.
Moral of the story, it's not hard to live with a battery so long as you "live within your means".
This was our last weekend before haulout so I disappeared there for a couple of days. Fall sailing is fantastic, rain or shine.
Paul, I forwarded the anchor catenary tension spreadsheet under separate email as you suggested.
Background: There has been considerable discussion on this forum on the art of anchoring based on individuals experience and location, such as coastal vs. inland waters. The spreadsheet application that I'm posting simply adds to that discussion by allowing one to explore how scope, tackle dimensions and the use of a kellet influences the "horizontal tension" on the anchor system. The application was authored by a John Holtrop in 2001 and I think posted to one of our forums by delliotg last winter. The application did not get any attention in that first posting perhaps because the original author did not well document the application. I have added comments, addressed some formatting to help make the software a bit more user friendly and filled in a couple of gaps in the rode density table. I have not altered the underlying code except to add one additional variable (rode angle at the surface:Cell B21, nor have I formally verified the code. This is a very simple application but I found it instructional to visualize how to optimize/compromise specific anchoring systems.
Use: Launch Microsoft Excel and check your security settings - on the menu bar select Tools/Macro/Security. By checking "Medium" security, you will be offered the choice of whether or not to launch any given macro. If security is set to "High" this application will likely be rejected because it is not "digitally signed".
Open this application and click the "Enable macros" button in the query box that opens. Read the instructions in the ReadMe section and quickly browse through the comments and variable definitions.
Fill in the required input data and click the "Calculate Rode Tension" button on line 2. The correct solution to this non-linear problem is presented when the "computed depth" and "input depth" are similar. The larger the value of the "horizontal tension" term, the greater the holding power of your anchor system.
Caveat: I am not a computer programmer nor do I endorse this software. Use it at your own risk. I am hoping, however, that through the peer review process of this forum, software applications such as this can be critiqued and, if warranted, improved upon and made available as additional tools.
The spreadsheet is now available for download in the Tech Tips - All boats area.
I opened it in OpenCalc (the openoffice spreadsheet application) without hitch. However, I did note that the distance from Bow numbers were as many as 4 decimal places! In my copy of the spreadsheet, I changed the 'Plotted X' column format to 2 decimal places which made the numbers on the graph easier to read. Besides, who can figure a distance of .001 feet?
(Where's my decimal imperial 250' tape measure )
I'm in the small group of americans that support switching to metric system for all units of measurement.. metric knot?
Paul - Congratulations, by the way. Glad you got the nod.
Being an engineer who's worked in Europe, Canada and the Far East from time to time over the past 20 years, I too am in favor of using the metric system in the States, but I would not count on it any time soon.
Please tell me - - who in their right mind can memorize that 1852 meters/hour or 1.852 klicks is equivalent to a metric knot. That's almost as absurd as remembering that 5280 feet are in a statute mile!
Only a kid who had that drummed into their heads: like 128 oz in a US Gallon and an acre is 44000 square feet could remember such rubbish! I was checking my recent edition of the <i>Mariner's Book of Days</i> which reminded me that 120 fathoms = a cable, and 7.5 cables equals a statute mile.
Instead I prefer knowing that one minute of arc is a NM (latitude only). Now there's a number you can hang your hat on.
Thanks Paul. I agree the numeric formatting should be changed. I'll pool any other comments, if any, and submit an updated version at some point. I would like to revise the graph as well but left most things as original in this first version.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by DaveR</i> <br />...Is a Kellet an anchor?...<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">There are a couple of good answers at the end of [url="http://www.catalina-capri-25s.org/forum/topic.asp?ARCHIVE=true&TOPIC_ID=5793&SearchTerms=kellet"]this thread[/url].
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.