Catalina - Capri - 25s International Assocaition Logo(2006)  
Assn Members Area · Join
Association Forum
Association Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Forum Users | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Catalina/Capri 25/250 Sailor's Forums
 General Sailing Forum
 Tohatsu 4 stroke outboards
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Steve Kostanich
1st Mate

Member Avatar

88 Posts

Initially Posted - 11/19/2003 :  16:02:15  Show Profile
Anyone have any experience with the Tohatsu 4 stroke motor either 8hp or 9.8 hp? I just got a flyer from Boater's World, and they show a 9.8hp/25" shaft, electric start at 87 pounds. The 20" manual start is 83 pounds. These are pretty light as 4 strokes go, and the prices listed are $2124.95 and 1849.95 respectively, not bad either. BUT if they are basically junk and a continous headache, then they are worthless. What say you?

Steve Kostanich C-25 1119 Equinox sr/sk

Edited by - on

osmepneo
Past Commodore

Members Avatar

USA
1420 Posts

Response Posted - 11/19/2003 :  16:22:04  Show Profile
Tohatsu and Nissan are basically the ob.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Frank Hopper
Past Commodore

Members Avatar

Pitcairn Island
6776 Posts

Response Posted - 11/19/2003 :  16:53:02  Show Profile  Visit Frank Hopper's Homepage
This the brand new product that has been mentioned on this site. At last info the 9.8 will not ship for several more months. The big deal is the weight, Tohatsu/Nissan is a very respected engine. This will be a totally new product. In the computer biz we often wait for rev 2.0 or at least 1.1.1

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

frog0911
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
1349 Posts

Response Posted - 11/19/2003 :  17:34:46  Show Profile
The Tohatsu 9.8, 4 stroke, 25 inch shaft with electric start is what we are waiting on for our new boat. Our dealer has been using these on all the Catalina's he sells and has had no complaints. It is built by Nissan, as mentioned, but is a new light weight version. Expected delivery is late Jan. or earily Feb. Performance data will have to wait until then. One thing is for sure, on a 250 the xls is a must. I have my old sailmaster on the boat now (20" shaft) and a sharp turn, of any kind, will cause the motor to cavitate.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Arlyn Stewart
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
2980 Posts

Response Posted - 11/19/2003 :  17:47:25  Show Profile  Visit Arlyn Stewart's Homepage
The cavitation in the sharp turn may not be from the prop coming out... In a sharp turn on the c250 the stern can turn so quickly that the prop now with the oncoming flow from the side instead of the front no longer has bite and cavitates.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

frog0911
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
1349 Posts

Response Posted - 11/19/2003 :  23:58:19  Show Profile
Sounds reasonable, but it sure looks like the prop is saying I need water. In any case the xls should resolve this problem. I am getting anxious about getting the new motor and not so anxious about the time of the year it is scheduled to arrive. (IRS)

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Dave Bristle
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Djibouti
10005 Posts

Response Posted - 11/20/2003 :  06:52:17  Show Profile
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by frog0911</i>
<br />...It is built by Nissan...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Historically, Nissan and Mercury 4-strokes have been built by Tohatsu (who also sold them under their own name). The main complaint had been weight--120# and up. Looks like the new models are really all-new, and will make them much more competitive. (I wonder when we'll hear about them from Mercury?)

I will add that Honda and Yamaha have been competing in this game for over 15 years now, and seem to have gradually arrived at roughly the same weights for their 8-9.9 4-strokes (both going up in weight). Either Tohatsu has a real breakthrough, or they have something that's gonna break! Maybe now we know why Honda has brought back the "Classic 8"...

Edited by - Dave Bristle on 11/20/2003 06:59:06
Go to Top of Page

Arlyn Stewart
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
2980 Posts

Response Posted - 11/20/2003 :  08:50:16  Show Profile  Visit Arlyn Stewart's Homepage
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">it sure looks like the prop is saying I need water<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Exactly... in the form of fresh water in front of the blades with some forward boat movement that will provide a bite into it.

Here is another example that almost everyone is familiar with. When backing down on an anchor... if the anchor sets well, the momentum of reverse motion will stretch the rode and when reverse momentum energy is exhausted, the stretched rode will pull the boat back forward while the prop is trying to bite in reverse... unable to bite, the prop cavitates.

The reverse cavitation is more noticable with a standard prop than a high thrust... and is really noticable on a motor that exhaust through the prop. Many of those motors have very little reverse thrust... this has been one of the questions that several of us have raised about the new Tohatsu motor... it hasn't been made clear yet if it has designed away from through the prop exhaust in reverse like Honda did.

Yamaha overcomes the need to redirect the exhaust by the sheer diameter of its blade which likely extends beyond the area of exhaust influence. Yamahas are very well thought of in regards to braking ability. The same is true for the new designed Honda. The old Honda 9.9 was not thought to provide adequate braking. Interestingly however, the Honda 8 Classic using the same prop diameter and pitch as the 9.9 provided very good braking because it did not use through the hub exhausting. The Nissan's have also been reported to have poor reverse thrust because of through the prop exhaust. I would want to know that this issue has been corrected before I would get excited about Tohatsu.

One last remark... Steve offered in his question that he was looking at two models, the xls electric start and the LS manual start. IMHO, if I were considering the LS, I would look very hard at the Honda 8 CLassic. The reasons are

<ul><li>its 4 lbs lighter </li><li>the shaft is 22.5 inches </li><li>its $200 cheaper </li><li> it has very good reverse thrust </li><li>it has great power</li><li>good fuel economy</li><li>a proven record of reliability</li><li>is very quiet</li></ul>

With all due respect to Don Peet who didn't have good fortune with this motors ease of starting, I have nothing but praise for the motor and its ease of starting which I characterized as being so easy that no electric start would ever be needed.

On the other hand, if I wanted an XLS, I would be very eager for something lighter than the Honda and Yamaha. I wouldn't care however if it had electric start. I got it for one reason... it was standard with the high thrust, high output alternator version. My 4 year old grandaughter likes to pull start the new Honda 8 and has no problem doing it.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

frog0911
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
1349 Posts

Response Posted - 11/20/2003 :  15:38:32  Show Profile
We don't need any more doom and gloom with our new boat so hope this new motor is as advertised. We will just have to wait until the first of the year to find out. Good Lord willing and the creek don't rise all will work out for the best.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Association Forum © since 1999 Catalina Capri 25s International Association Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.