Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
You turn on your GPS... (Ding!) Mine is in the car right now, but my slip outside is at N41-22.692 W71-57.752 (degrees and minutes). I'm sitting about 100 yards SE of there.
Edit: Google Earth shows me sitting at N41-22.672 W71-57.676. (Scary!)
BTW, does anyone know which nomenclature the Coast Guard prefers for voice communication of lat-lon? Do they prefer decimal degrees, degree-minute, or degree-minute-second? I'm guessing the first, but haven't set my equipment that way.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Dave Bristle</i> <br /> Do they prefer decimal degrees, degree-minute, or degree-minute-second? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> My knowledge of GPS stops at " That triangle on the screen is us"
Why are there two or three different ways to measure location. It escapes me. I have typed in coordinates exactly as they are given and a lot of times the waypoint is off. Anyone know why?
- Degrees, minutes (60 per degree), seconds (60 per minute) - Degrees and minutes with decimal fractions (like I used above) - Degrees with decimal fractions (like Paul used above)
A GPS can be set to display any of these, as can MapSource, Google Earth, etc. But you should be sure that you're not typing decimal fractions of minutes where seconds are expected, minutes where fractions of degrees are expected, etc.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by piseas</i> <br />You can type in address for that exact info.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">Not quite right for me... (It puts me in a cemetary. Don't bother..... )
The Coast Guard rescues enough jackasses day in and day out. If you actually have GPS coordinates and it is an emergency they are probably very happy you even know where the heck you are and not too concerned with how you read off the coordinates.
In the case of an emergency I can't see them say "sorry captain, but we don't accept coordinates in decimal form. Please convert to degrees, minutes, seconds and thousandths and re trasmit your location at that time."
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> The Coast Guard rescues enough jackasses day in and day out. If you actually have GPS coordinates and it is an emergency they are probably very happy you even know where the heck you are and not too concerned with how you read off the coordinates. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
Actually they'll probably quiz you very closely about your position and ask specific questions about your readout. I made this example in Google Earth using the same coordinate values in both degrees-minutes-seconds & decimal degrees (two common readouts). As you can see, they're over 17 miles distant from each other. This would make a huge difference to their response time if you read them off as degrees-minutes-seconds when you have your GPS set to another coordinate display system.
This is a very good case for having DSC attached to your VHF because it handles all this for you and simply shows your position to the receiving set w/o you having to say a word.
I agree that DSC is the answer but otherwise Dave Bristle's original question is a good one. From what I've read, in the days immediately following Katrina's wrath the various local, state and Federal agencies using different approaches, projections (street names vs. UTM vs. lat/lon)and formats to communicate locations between air and ground crews led to a great deal of confusion. Delliottq's example is also interesting. Format differences do not inherently result in location differences; the error arises in that different spatial precisions were entered. If round-off error doesn't get in the way, conversion between any of the three formats should be exact.
You're correct in that format differences don't cause errors in positions, it's when one person is using one format, and another is using a different but very similar format and thinks the position is in <i>their </i>format. That's how I came up with my 17 mile example. Rounding errors in the same format will only move your position slightly and you'd probably be in visual range.
I don't know if the USCG has a "preferred" format, and I wonder what DSC transmits (I'll do research on this). I think if the USCG has a preferred format, I'd probably set my GPS display to that format to eliminate that as an error. I've shown Rita how to get the to "right" screen on the GPS should she ever have to transmit our position. She's confident she can get to it, but who knows what happens when the adrenalin's pumping, the boat's rocking and I'm hurt or in the water? Once I have our new VHF setup and installed, it also displays your location, so in case DSC fails for some reason, she'll still be able to just our position off of the faceplate of the radio.
Getting further OT, another possible problem is cursor location. You can move your cursor around on your GPS screen and get Lat/Lon on the cursor's location, not yours. I've read several accounts on this happening when rescue people are looking for someone who's given them the location of their cursor and they're actually located miles away.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by delliottg</i> <br />You're correct in that format differences don't cause errors in positions, it's when one person is using one format, and another is using a different but very similar format and thinks the position is in <i>their </i>format. That's how I came up with my 17 mile example. Rounding errors in the same format will only move your position slightly and you'd probably be in visual range. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
I see now that others have experienced the same problem I did.
My earlier post <u><i>Why are there two or three different ways to measure location. It escapes me. I have typed in coordinates exactly as they are given and a lot of times the waypoint is off. Anyone know why?</i></u>
David's 17 mile discrepancy illustrates perfectly the reason for my question. Voice communication in an emergency can be dicey, and DSC won't help other boats without DSC to come to your rescue. My GPS offers user-selected data fields on the display--I selected lat/lon as one of them so no matter where the cursor is, that field shows <i>my</i> position. If I'm communicating with somebody in the fog, I can move the cursor to his position (the cursor lat/lon displays at the top) and tell him what mine is (displayed on the side).
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.