Catalina - Capri - 25s International Assocaition Logo(2006)  
Assn Members Area · Join
Association Forum
Association Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Forum Users | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Catalina/Capri 25/250 Sailor's Forums
 Catalina 25 Specific Forum
 Shorten boom
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

hafcat
Deckhand

Member Avatar

2 Posts

Initially Posted - 08/26/2009 :  19:06:13  Show Profile
I have a 1980 Catalina 25 Tall Rig and was wondering has anyone ever shortened the boom. The boom is about 11 feet long and when the main sail is up there quite a bit of boom (1 1/2 to 2 foot) sticking out past the sail. Since the tall rig means the boom is a foot lower and the boom can become an issue with tacking or gybing. I do not race or cruise so I'm not concerned about any real performance loss. Does anyone see any other possible negative ramifications?

Edited by - on

Voyager
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
5376 Posts

Response Posted - 08/26/2009 :  19:11:29  Show Profile
You probably need just a little bit of boom past the clew to attach the outhaul. In light conditions, you should keep the outhaul loose to provide a baggy sail, in heavy air, you want to flatten it by tightening the outhaul.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

dmpilc
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
4593 Posts

Response Posted - 08/26/2009 :  20:22:34  Show Profile
I expect it is that length because of the end boom sheeting to the transom. I would leave the length alone.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

mlg3733
Navigator

Members Avatar

118 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  06:51:24  Show Profile
If your concern is the possibility of being hit by the boom, I would suggest you replace your main with a shorter one, a main for a Capri 25 is a foot shorter, allowing for six foot headroom under the boom. I did that on our Tall Rig and performance did not seem to suffer while comfort increased tenfold. Your estimate of one and a half to two foot sticking past the sail doesn't seem right, it should be less than a foot at the most with the outhaul tight.

Edited by - mlg3733 on 08/28/2009 08:42:45
Go to Top of Page

Steve Milby
Past Commodore

Members Avatar

USA
5902 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  07:27:55  Show Profile
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by hafcat</i>
<br /> Does anyone see any other possible negative ramifications?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Because the boom extends aft as far as it does, the mainsheet attaches to it at a point further aft. That means that, when you tack or gybe, the mainsheet will swing across the cockpit near the transom. If you shorten the boom, the mainsheet will swing across the cockpit further forward, and there will be a considerable risk that it will foul itself on one of the cockpit occupants, creating a hazard to the occupants.

Personally, I would never alter a structural element of a boat, and wouldn't own a boat that has been so altered. My assumption is that the designer knew what he was doing when he specified a spar of a given length and dimensions, and, if he thought that extra boom length was unnecessary, he would have saved the builder the expense of providing it. Others might see it differently.

I sailed a tall rig C25 for many years, and didn't find the low boom to be a problem. You certainly have to be aware of it, but it isn't difficult to keep clear of it. I didn't think of the low boom as an annoyance. I thought of it simply as a factor that I couldn't ignore and had to adjust to.

Edited by - Steve Milby on 08/27/2009 07:38:19
Go to Top of Page

Dave Bristle
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Djibouti
10005 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  08:47:33  Show Profile
I had the standard rig--the boom height was much more comfortable than on a friend's TR, and made a bimini more practical. The Capri sail sounds like a good idea if the gooseneck stays below the mast gate so it won't jump out. That'll put the boom at the same level as on the SR while still having a 2' longer luff.

I agree with Steve--the boom length was for a reason--maybe two. (I would add to his that it gives a more efficient sheeting angle to the transom.)

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

bigelowp
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
1776 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  09:57:24  Show Profile
I fully echo Steve's sage words above.

But if you are set to make a change I would think that a shorter boom would require the main sheet being moved forward, which would require a new track and re-thinking everything with the likely result that overall inconvenience would be moved not eliminated.




Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Even Chance
Captain

Members Avatar

USA
393 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  10:58:20  Show Profile
I agree with all above (I think). If you shorten the boom and keep the mainsheet attached to the boom end, you're even more likely to be clotheslined on tacks and gybes than before. The Capri 25 sail works well -- see my TR bimini modification in the tech tips. If you don't race, then relocating the mainsheet isn't a class issue.

Fully hoisting the Capri 25 main will put the tack above the gate. You can either leave it down a little, or install some mastgates, which is what I did. They work fine.

If you neither race nor cruise . . . what do you do with the boat?

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

JohnP
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

1520 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  11:58:19  Show Profile
There is a very nice couple at my marina who spend nearly every weekend on their beautiful 32 or 35 foot sailboat but never seem to take it out sailing.

They don't race or cruise, but, who knows? ...They might day-sail once in a while.

Edited by - JohnP on 08/27/2009 12:00:47
Go to Top of Page

Nautiduck
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
3704 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  13:04:33  Show Profile
Cut off the end of the boom and weld that piece onto the bottom of the mast. That will get the boom higher above your head and further foreward too.

I agree with those who advise not to alter a structural component. The Capri 25 sail idea sounds the most reasonable.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

dmpilc
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
4593 Posts

Response Posted - 08/27/2009 :  19:43:35  Show Profile
I think that if you do shorten the boom, you'll also have to move the traveler and mainsheet to the front of middle of the cockpit, because the angle to the transom mounted traveler will be wrong.
Also, Dave B., on my TR the boom at full hoist is just below the mast gate, so, apparently our mast gate is lower on the mast than on a SR. I refer to Brooke's comment above. Because of that, I have a second sail stop in the slot below the boom so when I reef I can move the boom up above the gate and keep it there. BTW, we were out last Sat., beautiful day, with a reefed main and working jib and the GPS clocked us at 6 mph several times. Sweet!

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

hafcat
Deckhand

Members Avatar

2 Posts

Response Posted - 09/02/2009 :  22:33:47  Show Profile
Thanks for all your comments and I have decided to follow your advice and not shorten the boom.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Association Forum © since 1999 Catalina Capri 25s International Association Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.