Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
Sorry it's so small, but it's a pretty good example of when ColRegs aren't adhered to. Of course, I don't know the backstory, but I'd not want to be on the T-boned ship.
David C-250 Mainsheet Editor
Sirius Lepak 1997 C-250 WK TR #271 --Seattle area Port Captain --
Makes you wonder if anybody's paying attention, or asleep at the wheel? I could see not seeing a 30 foot sailboat off your bow, but a BATTLESHIP? C'mon, serious deriliction here. No wonder there are so many groundings and fuel spills that you never even hear about. Isn't there supposed to be a pilot, co-pilot, captain and a bunch of other deck-hands looking out for stuff? And I'd imagine they BOTH had bidirectional AIS???!!! Shouldn't there be a LOUD beep going off just before a collision?
I think that's a freighter, with cranes for its cargo...
AIS and a chartplotter allow a simple computation of Closet Point of Approach (CPA). Zero means collision. Radar shows the bridge that the bearing of a target is not changing, meaning the present speeds and courses will produce a collision. Then there's the "shall we dance" syndrome (I zig to starboard, he zigs to port), which is prevented by <b>VHF COMMUNICATION</b>. And I haven't even mentioned visual contact yet--assuming (charitably) that there was none. Both bridges were responsible, and both bridges were asleep.
Some people on both ships will now be hoping to get jobs as Walmart greeters.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.