Catalina - Capri - 25s International Assocaition Logo(2006)  
Assn Members Area · Join
Association Forum
Association Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Forum Users | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Catalina/Capri 25/250 Sailor's Forums
 General Sailing Forum
 Hull number
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

mroettersr
Navigator

Member Avatar

USA
148 Posts

Initially Posted - 10/09/2012 :  21:44:59  Show Profile
Hello,
Somewhere along the line I recall seeing an explanation of the hull number breakdown - i.e. sail number, boat year, tall rig/standard rig, keel type. Does anyone have this information? I'm just curious as I wonder if my boat was shipped as a tall rig back in 1983. It is clearly after nearly 40 years a standard. Perhaps it is like us senior citizens. We shrink as time goes on.

Mike Roetter
'83 C25 #3568 SK/SR
Marblehead on Lake Erie

Edited by - on

John Russell
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
3444 Posts

Response Posted - 10/10/2012 :  04:49:11  Show Profile
I don't think the HIN will tell you if it was a tall rig at birth. The "CTY" at the beginning refers to Catalina Yachts The next 5 digits refer to the hull (not sail) number of the boat. The final four characters are codes which refer to the month and year the hull was laid.

Here's a handy-dandy reference: http://www.nordicaboats.com/html/hin-numbers.html

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Steve Milby
Past Commodore

Members Avatar

USA
5902 Posts

Response Posted - 10/10/2012 :  05:36:07  Show Profile
If you call Catalina Yachts and give them your hull number, they will tell you almost anything you want to know about the specifics of the original order.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Stinkpotter
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Djibouti
9080 Posts

Response Posted - 10/10/2012 :  06:34:06  Show Profile
CTY = Catalina Yachts
K = C-25 (all rigs and keels)
0123 = hull #123
M = the following 3 characters are the Manufacture date
77 = 1977
F = January (A = August, B=Sept...)

The date format (last 4 characters) changed in 1984.

Edited by - Stinkpotter on 10/10/2012 06:39:59
Go to Top of Page

awetmore
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
1144 Posts

Response Posted - 10/10/2012 :  22:45:24  Show Profile
It seems unlikely that your mast and rigging would have been changed out, including full sail changes. In most cases it would be cheaper to sell the boat and get another one. What makes you think it would have been a tall rig earlier?

The tall rig attaches to different holes in the chainplates than the standard rig. You could check to see if there is any visible wear in the outer holes (used for tall). However I've seen plenty of standard rig boats with the upper shrouds mounted to the outer holes instead of the inner ones as they came from the factory, so that wouldn't be a sure thing.

When I bought my boat I didn't know if it was tall or standard. The best way to measure was with the mast down, but running a tape measure up the halyard (tie on a messenger line too) did the trick well enough for me.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page

Prospector
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Canada
3159 Posts

Response Posted - 10/11/2012 :  06:13:55  Show Profile  Visit Prospector's Homepage
Maybe not Alex...

A cruiser in a club is complaining that he is always over-canvassed, a racer feels that a higher mast will give him an edge. On a 20 yo boat, the sails could need replacing anyways.

Both sailors negotiate a swap and in an afternoon, 2 boats have switched.

Similarly, someone loses a mast due to a forestay failure/hurricane/crane accident. All that is available nearby is the opposite rig. It would be cheaper to accept the opposite rig and get used sails than order a mast from Selden Spars. You take what you can get.

There is at least one modern (1980's) boat in my marina with a homemade wooden mast. The guy figured it would be cheaper to go that way than to order a new mast when his failed.

Sailors are creative and inventive. they aren't going to let a rigging failure get in their way, and they will experiment to see what works best for them. Swapping a rig (and not necessarily with another boat of the same model) isn't all that uncommon.

I am interested in your comment about which rig attaches to which holes in teh chainplates though - I hadn't heard that before, and it makes sense. Is it in one of the diagrams someplace for future reference (this is the sort of thing I will ponder every spring when I lift the mast now)?

Edited by - Prospector on 10/11/2012 06:14:39
Go to Top of Page

Voyager
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

USA
5371 Posts

Response Posted - 10/11/2012 :  16:50:27  Show Profile
Just an FYI: USCG is now seeking comments on what information should be included in a revision of the HIN. Maybe rig type, keel type, should be included. Too late for our current boats, but for posterity.
Check on USCG.mil for more info.…

Edited by - Voyager on 10/11/2012 16:53:03
Go to Top of Page

Stinkpotter
Master Marine Consultant

Members Avatar

Djibouti
9080 Posts

Response Posted - 10/11/2012 :  16:57:44  Show Profile
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Voyager</i>
<br />Just an FYI: USCG is now seeking comments on what information should be included in a revision of the HIN. Maybe rig type, keel type, should be included...<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">...for all types of boats--power, sail, auxiliary sail, and who knows what else.

Edited by - Stinkpotter on 10/11/2012 17:00:00
Go to Top of Page

mroettersr
Navigator

Members Avatar

USA
148 Posts

Response Posted - 10/13/2012 :  19:22:19  Show Profile
Hello,
When I purchased this boat in 2001, the previous owner listed it as a tall rig. The boat was in nice condition and the survey was very positive - so I bought it. When I measured for a new genoa,walla, it measured out as a standard rig. The boat was purchased new in Houston, moved to the back waters of Louisiana and finally to Marblehead, Ohio where I purchased it from a retired USCG ship inspector. As you might expect, some goofy things were done to the boat over the years (DPO's?) and I often wondered if the boat had been changed from a tall to standard rig. I appears she was at one time set up to fly a spinnaker and I wondered if she had been raced hard and perhaps dis-masted - hence the rig change. Who knows? The bottom line is that the boat sails great as she is and gives great pleasure to her 69 year old skipper and the 71 year old admiral. Thanks for the good discussion.

Edited by - on
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Association Forum © since 1999 Catalina Capri 25s International Association Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.