Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
I finally got my new boat fully rigged up and ready to take out sailing this weekend, and had a wondertime time despite the stormy weather. One benefit of bad weather is it does bring wind. I had steady breeze of 10-14mph from the southeast both Saturday and Sunday, and I can report that she sails beautifully! The trip odometer on the GPS shows I put 35 miles under the keel this weekend. Here are some photos: http://webs.lanset.com/lgcharlot/sailing/5857-2/delta.htm
Larry Charlot Catalina 25WK/TR Mk. IV #5857 "Quiet Time" Folsom Lake, CA "You might get there faster in a powerboat, but in a sailboat, you're already there"
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">You need to move your jib sheet to the outboard side of your lifelines, because it looks like it is hanging up on them.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Will he be able to sheet in tight then without hanging up the other way? I remember my C-30 having the same problem, and opting for Larry's compromise as it is less stress on the life line than the other way....Only if I had a long run off the wind would I re-route them.
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">fhopper@mac.com Posted - 11/10/2003 : 18:14:09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Catalina confused things with the mark iv they moved the genoa track inboard and screwed up the lead <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by osmepneo</i> <br />Larry, can you compare the performance between QT I and QT II? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
The two boats seem surprisingly similar in the "seat of the pants feel" of sailing them. I would have expected the new boat to be more "tender" since the center of gravity of the ballast mass in the wing keel is something like 18" higher than in the swing keel. Another surprise was that the new boat sails upwind quite well on just the jib, whereas "QT1" could not do better than a 80ยบ close reach on her jib. Maybe "QTII" has a better headsail, or maybe the inboard genoa tracks on the Mk IV make a difference? Speed through the water seems about the same, except that the new boat feels like it accelerates much faster in wind gusts and when sheeting in on a tack change. I think the wing keel has less drag than the swinger since there is no keel trunk to disturb laminar water flow, and the wing is faired to smoother shape, especially on the leading edge. The lowered boom of the tall rig on the new boat will take some getting used to - it's definately a head-banger.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.