Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> IF YOU CAN READ THIS YOU'RE SAILING TOO DAMN CLOSE!! <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
This reminds me of the time we were jockeying for position at the start of a race, light air, beam reach, my genoa was touching the shoulder of the helmsman on a boat to my port. My wife came up with a new slant on an old phrase during that start "don't tack 'til you see the whites of their eyes <img src=icon_smile_shock.gif border=0 align=middle> !"
You guys are both assuming that the two boats were sailing on starboard tack. If they were sailing on port tack (as in a port-tack start), the other boat could be guilty of the foul. It should have headed up to windward to avoid contact with the leeward boat. Based on what Steve told us, we don't have enough facts to DSQ either boat.
Steve, speaking as your attorney, you have a right to remain silent. You don't have to tell those guys diddly-squat! <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Steve, speaking as your attorney, you have a right to remain silent. You don't have to tell those guys diddly-squat! <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle> <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size=2 id=quote>
Steve I never said that I thought that OJ was in the wrong, I was merely stating that you need to have a 720 provision in your SI's or the penalty would be much more severe.
Also, I think there is enough info given to come up with the following scenarios.
1. Assume both boats are on Stbd Tack. Since the term Shadowing was used, we can rule out that OJ could have been the overtaking vessel, The driver himself claims to be following. Therefore, once overlap occurred he would have been the windward boat and in the wrong.
2. On the opposite tack boats, If OJ was indeed shadowing, the contact boat would have just gybed in which case Steve Madsen would have been bearing down on him. Steve says they tacked away, if the boat he was following was now coming back at him close enough to put the genny on the drivers shoulder, a tack away would have most likely put his transom into the other guys port side, This didn't occur so I think we can rule this out with relatively great certainty.
So the real question remains, did the other skipper say the word "protest" Because if he didn't use that terminology, no penalty turns are required.
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.