Notice:
The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ.
The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.
I just got mail for the first time in a while and there were the update pages from Catalina Direct. I of course went thru the new pages to see what was going on and there it was - Spreader Brackets.
"Part of the spreader bracket assembly on early catalina 25's were cast aluminum. It can fail without warning. Inspection doesn't help as a casting that looks fine today can fracture tommorow."
Yikes! I was not aware of this issue. Anyone ever heard of this?
Sten
DPO C25 #3220 "Zephyr", SR, FK SV Lysistrata - C&C 39 - Worton Creek MD
Yes. Replacement of the original aluminum spreader sockets is a 'standard' maintenance-upgrade on this boat. I haven't seen any details on the failures, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was due to corrosion in a saltwater environment.
Since they are not an item you want to fail... I'd plan on replacing them.
Yup--discussed many times here, and recommended to new owners of older C-25s. I think they changed to welded stainless around 1981-2. If your brackets look shiny, they're probably stainless.
Yes, the aluminum spreader brackets on the boats from the late 70's (I don't remember if this extended into the early 80's or not) were a real potential problem. Catalina Yachts experienced enough warranty problems that the factory developed the stainless steel spreader brackets that all of the later models came with. Additionally, all Catalina dealers at the time were notified of the potential problem and were advised to have their customers retrofit the new stainless brackets. So, many of the older boats already have been changed.
Additionally, those early boats also had aluminum mast steps. These were also changed over to stainless steel at the same time.
OK - musta been snoozing when that topic came up. Just don't remember seeing it in the CD catalogue until seeing the update pages. And since I had an 82 I may have not had to worry, but even so!!!! I remember unstepping the mast and rerigging everything when we changed to all spectra lines and noting that the deck plate was stripped and not completely affixed to the hull... i worried about that for a whole season before finally biting the bullet. Rig failure is my worst nightmare.
Whenever I attach something to my aluminum mast with stainless steel screws, I'm always concerned about the possibility of creating a reaction between dissimilar metals. This thread raises the question, "Why isn't the attachment of a stainless steel spreader bracket to an aluminum mast with stainless steel screws a problem in that respect, and if it is, does the use of caulk under the screws and bracket reduce the problem?"
Steve, for that reason, it's a good idea to use Lanocote or Nevrseize (sp?) on the threads, and it probably wouldn't hurt to cover the whole contact area. On self-tappers, I screw them in (to tap), unscrew, coat, and rescrew.
The catalina kit includes an insulating film for the back of the brackets and dielectric thread lube. I needed to replace one of mine, but they are only available as a kit so I replaced both.
I know I have the stainless mast step, but I think I have the aluminium spreader sockets. I'll have to look closer in the fall when the mast comes down (I've already had it up and down twice this season, and the guys at the marina are getting tired of that game).
Here's a question though - if the spreaders are aluminium, wouldn't they also be prone to failure (Stainless is hard, aluminum is soft, instead of the socket stressing to failure, now the spreader would), and if the end of the spreader is contacting the stainless socket, shouldn't it also be coated with some kind of goo?
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Prospector</i> <br />...Here's a question though - if the spreaders are aluminium, wouldn't they also be prone to failure (Stainless is hard, aluminum is soft, instead of the socket stressing to failure, now the spreader would), and if the end of the spreader is contacting the stainless socket, shouldn't it also be coated with some kind of goo? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">Chris, I'll offer some opinions here, supported only by my own observations... First, cast aluminum is brittle and somewhat subject to cracking due to flaws in the casting process. Extruded aluminum (as with tubing, masts, beer cans, etc.) is much less so. Second, both aluminum and stainless protect themselves by oxidizing a coating on their surfaces. While the two metals might be somewhat reactive together (they are not terribly far apart on the galvanic scale), their surface oxidation layers might protect them in casual contact, such as a tube in a socket. The best evidence is: <i>Nobody seems to be worrying about it.</i> (A stainless self-tapping screw in an aluminum boom could be another matter.)
Now I've told you way more than I know.
BTW, you can recognize the stainless sockets from below--look for evidence of a weld between the tube and the base plate, and also any shininess suggests stainless instead of cast aluminum. The '85s had them--I suspect the '84s did too.
"It is easy to tell if your boat still has the old cast aluminum spreader brackets as they are the same dull gray color as the castings at both ends of your boom. The new stainless fittings are shiny, chrome like stainless steel."
Notice: The advice given on this site is based upon individual or quoted experience, yours may differ. The Officers, Staff and members of this site only provide information based upon the concept that anyone utilizing this information does so at their own risk and holds harmless all contributors to this site.